Test Evaluation Contest

2026-04-10 19:05:00
Test Room 1

Contestants observe a test speech and present an evaluation of it

1. Dave Brown
0 / 100
Analytical Quality

Clear, Focused

0 / 40
0162739
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Recommendations

Positive, Specific, Helpful

0 / 30
0122129
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Technique

Sympathetic, Sensitive, Motivational

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
Summation

Concise, Encouraging

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
collapse ▲
2. Carol White
0 / 100
Analytical Quality

Clear, Focused

0 / 40
0162739
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Recommendations

Positive, Specific, Helpful

0 / 30
0122129
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Technique

Sympathetic, Sensitive, Motivational

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
Summation

Concise, Encouraging

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
collapse ▲
3. Alice Johnson
0 / 100
Analytical Quality

Clear, Focused

0 / 40
0162739
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Recommendations

Positive, Specific, Helpful

0 / 30
0122129
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Technique

Sympathetic, Sensitive, Motivational

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
Summation

Concise, Encouraging

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
collapse ▲
4. Bob Smith
0 / 100
Analytical Quality

Clear, Focused

0 / 40
0162739
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Recommendations

Positive, Specific, Helpful

0 / 30
0122129
FairGoodVery GoodExcellent
Technique

Sympathetic, Sensitive, Motivational

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
Summation

Concise, Encouraging

0 / 15
051014
FairGood Very GoodExcellent
collapse ▲
Judging items Excellent Very Good Good Fair Dave Brown Carol White Alice Johnson Bob Smith
Analytical Quality

Clear, Focused

40 28–39 17–27 0–16
Recommendations

Positive, Specific, Helpful

30 22–29 13–21 0–12
Technique

Sympathetic, Sensitive, Motivational

15 11–14 6–10 0–5
Summation

Concise, Encouraging

15 11–14 6–10 0–5
Total 0 0 0 0
Judging Criteria

Analytical Quality

Analytical Quality refers to the effectiveness of the evaluation. Every evaluation should carefully analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the speaker's presentation. Were the evaluator’s comments clear and logical? Did the evaluator identify specific strengths and weaknesses of the presentation?

Recommendations

Recommendations are an important part of an evaluation. An evaluator not only points out the strengths and weaknesses of a speech, he/she also offers specific recommendations for improvement. Recommendations should be practical, helpful and positive, and they should enable the speaker to improve his or her next presentation.

Technique

Technique refers to the manner in which the evaluator presents his/her comments and recommendations. An evaluator should be sensitive to the feelings and needs of the speaker, yet inspire and encourage the speaker in his/her future speaking efforts.

Summation

Summation is how the evaluator concludes the evaluation. The conclusion should briefly summarize the evaluator's comments and suggestions, and be positive and encouraging.